Cool internet kid is an oxymoron. 90% of the people who claim atheism have no idea what they hell they are talking about and what atheism really is. It's mainly people trying to be trendy and excepted among the majority so they can finally be excepted at something. Atheism is not being able to come to the final conclusion that there is or isn't a god and sides on the side that there is no god. Me, a Christian, knows more about atheism than poser atheists do. That's pathetic.
God, not bound by time or space, making the universe makes WAY more sense than matter creating itself from nothing, which is impossible according to science... oo I see a contradiction. Nice fail at trying to explain our existence science. Silly naive science will never be able to explain everything. It should stick to numbers and building blocks.
wanna make a flaw in religion, the bible.
and that's it, i mean have you read it "God created the heaven and the earth" doesn't even go into detail
Obviously you haven't even picked up a bible and bothered reading ALL OF GENESIS CHAPTER 1 (the first thing you read in the bible) which is 31 verses going into detail of how heaven and earth was made. To denounce the bible without opening to the first page or even reading it speaks your level of intelligence on the matter loud and clear.
Billy Ruben knows religion. This is what he has to say about it:
You're either a Theist, or an Atheist.
You're either Gnostic(Knowing), or Agnostic(Unknowing).
You MUST be a combination of the TWO choices.
Gnostic Theist = There is a God, and I KNOW this. (Hardcore biblepushers.)
Agnost Theist = There is a God, and I believe this is true. (Your average Christian/religious person.)
Gnostic Atheist = There is no God, and I KNOW this. (Scientifically illogical, this is what most posers claim to be. Then again, they just say atheist because they don't really know /shit/.)
Agnostic Atheist = There may or may not be a God. I am unable to prove either case, and thus go with the latter - which has more 'soft' evidence - and say there is no God. (tl;dr, most logical "religion". Can't fuxx wittit.)
I myself am an Agnostic Atheist. I don't know if there really is a God or not, but tbh, I couldn't care less.
That is all.
Billy is a wise person. What he says is true. This is what I was talking about above.. poser atheists are all over the internet trying to be cool and fit in with the crowd.
Atheism never said anything about matter spontaniously coming out of nowhere, it simply sais energy has always existed much like your god has always existed, and that matter is created out from energy given what einstein proved trough mathematics.
There are many theories however on how energy came to be here in this universe trough the big bang, for example M theory (membrane theory) which involves several membranes splitting one universe from the next. One of theese 2 theoretically bumped into eachother and created a energy surge, which then went on to create Hydrogen, which turn into a hydrogen fog. that then again starts fusing when it gets concentrated enough and creates a star. this was the scientific birth of the universe. (however flawed my version of it is, given 1. i am not a physicist and 2. i am tired)
out from this we will continue towards the scientific birth of earth, comets bombard a molten sun trapping its molten core, after long bombarding earth comes out. with a magnetosphere and so forth, i am to tired to write anythig more elobrate seriously.
out from this carbon bindings are born, with first several really simple ones, which then become longer and more elobrate carbon strings, binding in alitle NH3 and COOH into it weaving the first amino acid, which can naturally occur. after millions of years theese carbon strings, were binded into a primitive bacteria which then could get more properties trough "digestion" of other primitive cells (once again i am not fully eduacated on the subject as of yet i can not write the full story) primitive cells then bound together and so forth until you got the first very primitive fish or something similar. which then acording to where it were born and so forth were breeded on according to what the fishes of its same species needed in that area. for example if a mutation were to make it's mouth longer (and this was usefull for feeding or so forth in it's natural habitat) it would be somewhat an alpha male/female. so forth evolution took its toll.
this is what some of us believe.
besides I hate both kinds of people in this thread, honestly why do any off you need to push your beliefs on the other?
so people rather than taking jabs a eachother take a chill pill and relax