-
Piss Christ Controversy
by Holy on 24 Nov, 2010 02:09
-
In 1987, a photographer named Andrew Serrano took a picture of a plastic crucifix in a jar of his urine. This picture is known as Piss Christ and it bestowed Serrano with $15,000 from the government. Getting money for covering Jesus with urine outraged many people. Serrano soon after received death threats and hate mail from the American public. A nun said that it is a beautiful picture. Serrano claims that it targets perceived commercializing or cheapening of Christian icons in contemporary culture.
Is this picture appropriate and does it have a message which justifies it's use of urine. Why or why not?
-
Reply #1
by AlphaWeeaboo on 24 Nov, 2010 02:14
-
I don't quite get the message but that much money just for covering a picture in piss doesn't sound right.
-
Reply #2
by Travis on 24 Nov, 2010 02:18
-
Wait, so I can take anything that represents something, put it in a jar, piss in the jar, publish my work and get money?
-
Reply #3
by Kwaurtz on 24 Nov, 2010 02:22
-
If you aren't going to post seriously, don't bother posting it.
Honestly this is a perfect thing to get money for. This man took a subject that is often discussed, but attached an image to it. Religion's like Christianity are all about money now a days. They have massive televisions and business' based around it, and thats not what it should be about.
-
Reply #4
by Holy on 24 Nov, 2010 02:25
-
If you aren't going to post seriously, don't bother posting it.
Honestly this is a perfect thing to get money for. This man took a subject that is often discussed, but attached an image to it. Religion's like Christianity are all about money now a days. They have massive televisions and business' based around it, and thats not what it should be about.
Is it so much Christian's doing it as much as it is Major companies doing it? Example: Companies have Christmas sales and use it to their advantage to get more shoppers.
-
Reply #5
by Kwaurtz on 24 Nov, 2010 02:26
-
Both, there was a recent televised event where three really well known televangelists when on to a talk show, were completely shaded, dubbed over, but the three of them did not believe in the message they preached anymore, and only did it because thats how they made their leaving, preaching a message they do not mean.
-
Reply #6
by Travis on 24 Nov, 2010 02:29
-
They do not believe though. True followers do it because they want to spread the word not make money.
-
Reply #7
by Holy on 24 Nov, 2010 02:36
-
I don't quite get the message but that much money just for covering a picture in piss doesn't sound right.
To avoid confusion. It's the crucifix which is in the jar of urine, not a picture of a crucifix covered in urine.
Both, there was a recent televised event where three really well known televangelists when on to a talk show, were completely shaded, dubbed over, but the three of them did not believe in the message they preached anymore, and only did it because thats how they made their leaving, preaching a message they do not mean.
I'd say all in all it's just a manipulation of scripture in order to get a few more dollars. I don't think it's even right for these people who take advantage of Christian to be called Christians. As far as the commercialization goes, even Easter is used as a marketing tool for chocolate companies. I believe the picture has a good message, however, is the use of urine a poor choice to convey this message?
-
Reply #8
by Jorgen on 24 Nov, 2010 08:11
-
i'd say, it does have some symbolic though, how weas Christ treated when he was here on earth (asuming he was) well he was treated like shit/piss =P
but yeah, if you can make money from throwing some paint on a paint thingy (damn i'm tired) then why not get money for this?
-
Reply #9
by Finniespin on 24 Nov, 2010 09:12
-
i'd say, it does have some symbolic though, how weas Christ treated when he was here on earth (asuming he was) well he was treated like shit/piss =P
but yeah, if you can make money from throwing some paint on a paint thingy (damn i'm tired) then why not get money for this?
Art is all about shit. U make something, Have a "fake" feeling about it. Make a fake story around it. And you have your money. Enjoy swindling people...
-
Reply #10
by Jorgen on 24 Nov, 2010 11:28
-
this is still epic, i love things that actually look like what it is suposed to be =P
-
Reply #11
by Finniespin on 24 Nov, 2010 12:14
-
-
Reply #12
by Jorgen on 24 Nov, 2010 12:48
-
there douche
-
Reply #13
by Raunky on 24 Nov, 2010 17:14
-
i'd say, it does have some symbolic though, how weas Christ treated when he was here on earth (asuming he was) well he was treated like shit/piss =P
but yeah, if you can make money from throwing some paint on a paint thingy (damn i'm tired) then why not get money for this?
Art is all about shit. U make something, Have a "fake" feeling about it. Make a fake story around it. And you have your money. Enjoy swindling people...
You obviously have a deep understanding of art.
Is that why people with nice jobs quit so they can pursue a career in arts like music and film making? So they can make more money? NEWS FLASH: People make a lot less money making art then they would in a day job.
-
Reply #14
by Dante on 24 Nov, 2010 17:30
-
I think you are all looking to hard at it. Maybe the guy just wanted to piss in a jar with a crucifix ever think of that?