Conjoint Gaming [Game On]
CG Administration Section => Ban Request => Solved Ban Requests => Topic started by: Coreybush11 on May 16, 2011, 07:50:21 AM
-
YOUR in game name EXACTLY!:(=CG=)Coreybush11
the exact name of the person you are requesting a ban at the time they were on the server:top stunna
What were they doing: RDM over the course of two rounds
Which server was it: TTT #1
What time/day was it (include timezone if possible):EST 5:47 A.M. 5/16/2011
Additional Notes:Pictures
(http://img862.imageshack.us/img862/8997/capturee.gif)
(http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/3480/capture3.gif)
(http://img849.imageshack.us/img849/8652/capture2.gif)
Should he be banned? He left right after a slay, so he technically was punished but if he was going to leave right after it wouldn't make a difference. I have thought about this before but never really had to work through it.
But it was clear he didn't have regrets for his actions, and killing his traitor buddy is proof of that. He walked straight up to Shisa and shot him in the face.
-
If he left after the slay yes. I hate rdmers and if their obvious and not careing they don't deserve to play on CG. STEAM ID?
-
STEAM_0:0:21521033
And it was in a screenshot, just so you know.
Addban isn't working right according to Acecool, so can someone add it to sourcebans?
-
Ummm no? He got his punishment it is his choice if he wants to leave or not...
-
Ummm no? He got his punishment it is his choice if he wants to leave or not...
Agreed. Some people rage quit if they're slayed, but they've been slayed so punishment dealt.
I told symbolzzzz about this once or twice, I don't see why someone should be banned for leaving after getting slayed...
-
Thing is, they get slayed and leave vs leave without being slayed for actions
Only difference is one simple command. Let's say he left right before Shisa could type up the command, would we still let it slip? There is very little difference between the two other than timing. As for already being "punished", he hasn't fully served it out yet. Waiting the whole round without playing. Chances are if they RDM and rage quit they PROBABLY don't deserve to be on our server again.
-
Thing is, they get slayed and leave vs leave without being slayed for actions
Only difference is one simple command. Let's say he left right before Shisa could type up the command, would we still let it slip? There is very little difference between the two other than timing. As for already being "punished", he hasn't fully served it out yet. Waiting the whole round without playing. Chances are if they RDM and rage quit they PROBABLY don't deserve to be on our server again.
so if he went away from his keyboard for that rond and left afterwards it would be all better?
that is retarded, LETS BAN PEOPLE FOR NOT WANTING TO WASTE TIME, good job guys.
-
Shisa already banned him for a week.... For rdming a traitor, him of course...
Hmm 1 rdm
-
Ummm no? He got his punishment it is his choice if he wants to leave or not...
Agreed. Some people rage quit if they're slayed, but they've been slayed so punishment dealt.
I told symbolzzzz about this once or twice, I don't see why someone should be banned for leaving after getting slayed...
Since i liked the old rules more oh well times change...
-
Ummm no? He got his punishment it is his choice if he wants to leave or not...
Agreed. Some people rage quit if they're slayed, but they've been slayed so punishment dealt.
I told symbolzzzz about this once or twice, I don't see why someone should be banned for leaving after getting slayed...
Since i liked the old rules more oh well times change...
THE FUCK IS UPP WITH YOU R TARDS, WE DIDN'T HAVE RULES BACK THEN SO SAYING I LIKED THE OLD RULES IS STUPID BECAUSE THEY WERE MADE BY YOU... I mean bloody hell guys, there was no official rule back then.
-
I'm not a r tard :(
-
Anyways, I am mad yesyes blabla, for now no reason to ban kthxlock. If you want to change this then take it upp in a meeting.