Conjoint Gaming [Game On]
CG Administration Section => Admin Abuse => Admin Department => Solved Admin Abuse => Topic started by: Kwaurtz on April 22, 2011, 05:55:39 PM
-
Name of player reporting abuse:
Kwaurtz
Admin who is suspected of the abuse:
Matthew
In which server did the abuse ocurr?:
TTT#1
What ocurred, what did the abuse consist of:
I was accused of killing matthew with the bridge on crummycradle. I had been possessing it the round as well, he said he saw my name and slayed me for it no questions asked. Chickema3 and Maggots both said they didn't think I did it but he chose to ignore them and slayed me out of anger anyways because he was detective that round
What time and day did it happen (put down your time zone too):
3:50 april 22nd est
Additional comments:
Nobody else was there to support matthews claim, and when I had asked him if he had a screenshot or any proof he choose to ignore the question and proceeded.
-
i died and saw your name in the bridge right when it happened and chicken also said he thinked you didnt do he wasnt 100% sure
-
I had been sitting over the bridge trying to get to posess it spamming e. So that people couldn't do this very thing since I had fell off of the side. There were four other dead people at the time. You never let me say anything or explain my side of the story. Only reason I'm posting this entire thing. You slayed me when I did nothing wrong.
-
As much as i do not want to say this trollface he did not kill you matthew. I did not see him kill you. He might of, but i did not see him kill you.
:P :P :P :P
-
if you saw you didnt see him kill you why do you say that he didnt kill me?
-
Can we please type out coherent sentences? I don't understand what you just posted.
-
artix said that you didnt kill me but then he also said that he didn't see it happen
-
I was next to matthews at the time that he died. Although I am not sure that it was kwaurtz and am not sure if what matthew did was the right thing, but it was only 1 slay. I don't think its anything to get so anal about.
just play game, become a traitor and accuse him and get him rdm'ed :) so simpo
-
One accidental slay. Let's strip Matt's admin shall we? And while were at it, we can systematically demote our entire staff because ALL admins make fuck ups.
-
If you had read my post's, you'd notice that this is not about the slay, but the fact that he acted without asking my side or inquiring as to what may have happened.
-
One accidental slay. Let's strip Matt's admin shall we? And while were at it, we can systematically demote our entire staff because ALL admins make fuck ups. Gee Lucifer, how many times do you have to be reminded?
You are a moron. Admin abuses add up, if this one was took into consideration in a later abuse thread it could result in a fitting punishment. However if we never post them because its "just one" then we'll never get any results.
-
if you saw you didnt see him kill you why do you say that he didnt kill me?
and you mean what?
-
artix said that you didnt kill me but then he also said that he didn't see it happen
thats what i meant bers
-
artix said that you didnt kill me but then he also said that he didn't see it happen
thats what i meant bers
Matthew start using readable sentences. This isn't entertaining if I can only understand one side.
-
As much as i do not want to say this trollface he did not kill you matthew. I did not see him kill you. He might of, but i did not see him kill you.
:P :P :P :P
atrix said that kwautz didn't kill me but then he also said that he didn't see what happened
-
One accidental slay. Let's strip Matt's admin shall we? And while were at it, we can systematically demote our entire staff because ALL admins make fuck ups. Gee Lucifer, how many times do you have to be reminded?
You are a moron. Admin abuses add up, if this one was took into consideration in a later abuse thread it could result in a fitting punishment. However if we never post them because its "just one" then we'll never get any results.
Oh good, it was "took into consideration". Fun fact, calling someone a moron and then making yourself sound like a redneck who stumbled across a computer doesn't really help ya.
-
I think we should give him a stern talking to and puddi puddi puddi puddi puddi.
Also, we really need to start doing suspensions instead of just talking if some one does something dumb.
-
Kwaurtz you know that admins dont need recorded evidince and/or pics. This might be an accident though, if you were spectating behind the bridge and the actuall person who was doing it dissapeared I can see why he would do it. He should check your side though.
@Artix What? I no understand post. do u see ore u not sea? do u no?
-
(clap****clap****clap) oh good that's still working!!
-
and kwaurtz if you where right above the bridge when it happened why didnt you give me the name of the person in it?
-
WAsn't paying attention, and when I triedto tell you it wasn't me, you never acknowledged me saying anything.
-
I had been sitting over the bridge trying to get to posess it spamming e. So that people couldn't do this very thing since I had fell off of the side. There were four other dead people at the time. You never let me say anything or explain my side of the story. Only reason I'm posting this entire thing. You slayed me when I did nothing wrong.
im just wondering if you where sitting over the bridge spamming e how did you not see the name of the person in it?
-
I would like to point out that even if you are dead sometimes a person's name WILL NOT SHOW UP if he's possessing a prop, sucks I know but it happens. I would like to point out the obvious fact of this. the Admins are here to look at both sides of a story and provide a decent conclusion based on the EVIDANCE. The fact that Matthew ignored anything Kwuartz said and slayed him does not sit well with me, also if anyone says that I do the same I dare them to show me proof of it, every time I'v given out a slay it's after I'v looked at both sides or WATCHED IT HAPPEN!!!
Also an earlier statement is correct, if we let any abuse slide because "it's only one" then we will be ignoring admins that have no right having admin powers. If it was up to me I'd dismiss any further testimony from said user because it's obvious that he's either A) a 'friend' of the admin or B) someone who would benifet from having a retarded admin left alone.
-