This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Takeo The Wise Wolf
31
« on: July 09, 2011, 06:48:29 PM »
M16A4 jams are actually pretty uncommon. And I've seen AK-47s jam up before in person (poor maintenance). AK-47s aren't made like they used to be; now the vast majority are cheap knockoffs of the real deal. The M16A4 is more expensive, but that means higher quality material and parts.
32
« on: July 07, 2011, 03:01:50 AM »
33
« on: July 05, 2011, 10:01:10 AM »
34
« on: July 05, 2011, 09:50:55 AM »
And then there was one, Klondor.
35
« on: July 04, 2011, 07:53:46 PM »
I've played with him now. Seems like a decent-enough person. No rule violations that I saw.
+1
36
« on: July 03, 2011, 08:55:28 PM »
Stay active on forums and in-game.
37
« on: July 03, 2011, 08:53:52 PM »
+0
I haven't played with him before in TTT, so I'll reserve my judgement.
Just post more frequently on the forums and make sure you're pretty active in-game.
38
« on: June 30, 2011, 12:19:59 PM »
I can vouch for this. Junkie RDMed at least once a round, and I suspect he was part of a "raiding party", or a group of aimbotters. No evidence of the raiding party connection, but I think in my screenshots I have a damlog of one of the rounds Junkie. rdmed.
39
« on: June 30, 2011, 11:45:54 AM »
...nuclear winter and most likely human life will go extinct, now is it better to go down in history as the country that contributed to the end of human life or go down in history as the country that went down willingly to save human existance?
This is Mutually Assured Destruction. Also, after a nuclear war, there wouldn't be anywhere LEFT to live.
That's why it's the ultimate deterrent; You can't live on a planet after that kind of disaster.
And it's better to KEEP our weapons and NOT have to go down. I'd rather keep living and NOT live at the whim of North Korea or Iran, tyvm...
Hell who wouldn't but I am saying if they had performed a preemptive strike and sent nukes your way, would you send more nukes their way which would increase the chance of a nuclear winter.
Lets face it America won't be the first to send nukes they will, chances are also that the nukes sent towards you will create a nuclear winter, if however it doesn't the nuclear bombs sent their way will.
But imagine how the American people would react if we just TOOK a nuke to say, LA? The US can't let something like that slide. IF they nuke us, they die. That's why the WON'T.
40
« on: June 30, 2011, 11:34:07 AM »
...nuclear winter and most likely human life will go extinct, now is it better to go down in history as the country that contributed to the end of human life or go down in history as the country that went down willingly to save human existance?
This is Mutually Assured Destruction. Also, after a nuclear war, there wouldn't be anywhere LEFT to live. That's why it's the ultimate deterrent; You can't live on a planet after that kind of disaster. And it's better to KEEP our weapons and NOT have to go down. I'd rather keep living and NOT live at the whim of North Korea or Iran, tyvm...
41
« on: June 30, 2011, 09:34:12 AM »
7.62mm rounds are easy to get here in the states because of the Ruger Mini thirty and AK clones and because SKS's are easy to come by. On top of the millions of foreign made rounds that are sold here.
 -------- Anyway, I rescind my ammo portion. Still my opinion that the M16A4 with the M203 (HE Frag) is the winrar here =p
42
« on: June 30, 2011, 09:15:36 AM »
Granted, but now your head has exploded.
I wish I had a 105mm AT gun.
43
« on: June 30, 2011, 09:08:29 AM »
Actually, the United States may be prohibited from MANUFACTURING more thermonuclear weapons (The conventional explosive MOAB has the same explosive power as the hiroshima bomb without the radiation, so we just make those now), we ARE allowed to modernize and manufacture new components for the arsenal. This includes, but is not limited to: - Manufacture of new plutonium pits for the weapons to replace aging fissile material
- New payload-delivery methods (ICBM/SBM/bombs)
- New warhead assemblies
- Guidance system improvements
- New "Safety" systems
Also, Geneva convention has no bearing on the use or deployment of thermonuclear weaponry. The only deterrent to the deployment of said weapons is MAD: Aka, Mutually Assured Destruction. To simplify that further: If someone throws a nuke, the UN and NATO getting pissy is the LEAST of our problems.
44
« on: June 30, 2011, 07:45:27 AM »
I frankly think that we need to keep ahold of all of our stockpile; It's the only deterrent we've got against hostile thermonuclear powers.
45
« on: June 30, 2011, 02:50:23 AM »
+0
I'd like to see you more on the forums, this isn't entangled with post count either, I want you to be 'not as new' to the forums, sorry if you don't understand that 
You have a good first impression on me, so i'm leaning towards Yes.
I can TOTALLY understand where you are coming from. A man can post a whole lot of spam and have post counts in the thousands, but that doesn't mean he's experienced with the forum. It just means he knows how to copy/paste some generic responses to a thousand threads. I just hope I can prove that I'm worth of the responsibility of administrative duty to all of you. I waited to see if I acutally saw him on the server for decent amounts of time. If he stays as active as he is now...
+1 double rainbow style
Rainbows make scout cry! So it's like...three yes-es?
ShoutBox!
|
Show Posts
