16

General Gaming Talk / Re: Favorite hero's?

« on: 13 Feb, 2013 22:07 »

Phantom Lancer, Rubick



Also Riki and Drow 

17

In The News / Re: Patents

« on: 11 Feb, 2013 21:45 »

Patenting is one of those things that just has to be a double edged sword. It's super helpful for inventive people who want to keep big companies from ripping them off, but on the other hand you have companies that then patent stupid things just to trick individuals who probably didn't mean any harm into giving the company more money. Patents in theory are a great idea, but just like pretty much everything else that's a good idea, it gets abused by the same people that it was intended to protect against.

18

General Gaming Talk / Re: How could anyone forget this...

« on: 11 Feb, 2013 21:38 »

Holy shit, I listened to this a LOT when it came out. Is it sad that I just now realized what it was about?

19

General Gaming Talk / Re: Dota 2 CG Team?

« on: 11 Feb, 2013 21:34 »

All you guys should reply here: http://www.conjointgaming.com/forum/index.php?topic=9033.0     


When you get the chance.

20

General Gaming Talk / Dota 2 Team Organization

« on: 11 Feb, 2013 00:33 »

Alright, so the interest level for this was good enough to start getting things organized, so here's how this is gonna roll:

There are going to be (for now) 2 teams, both under the banner of Conjoint Gaming. One will be for casual gamers looking to improve their dota skills/ just have fun, etc., while the other team will be exclusively for competitive team playing.

In this thread we would like everyone interested in joining a CG Dota 2 team to post which team they intend on joining, general level of Dota skill, and how active you plan on being.

All this being said, be aware that both teams will follow general CG rules, such as no trolling, racism, etc. Also be aware that these two teams are not in direct competition with one another, although they are both considered CG teams.

To add to this:  The Competitive Team has first rights to naming.  So the fun team will be named after the first team has their name.  (For the CG moniker - not as in naming members.)

These teams should not be exclusive of each other.   

The Competitive team may be wise in watching the fun team, as it would be a great way to get people interested, have them learn the game,  get good at it, and then move over to the Competitive team.

Cad approved.

21

General Gaming Talk / Re: Dota 2 CG Team?

« on: 10 Feb, 2013 18:23 »

So two teams, one competitive, one relaxed. We probably don't have more than 10 Dota players in CG anyways. Also, I know I personally would like to get to the competitive point, and right now I am fairly decent at the game in general, I just simply haven't had enough time to learn all the individual heroes.

22

General Gaming Talk / Re: Dota 2 CG Team?

« on: 10 Feb, 2013 12:36 »

So I guess what would have to happen is we organize exactly who would absolutely be interested here, and should multiple teams be desired, who's on what team. We should have party dota sessions to figure out who's good at what, etc.

23

General Gaming Talk / Re: Dota 2 CG Team?

« on: 10 Feb, 2013 02:10 »

Psst: Ask before making a "CG" team. Just asking.

Yeah, thought about that afterwards. Appropriate format for asking?



Although it should be noted that right now the team is blank, just sitting there. It's not a part of anything since it isn't filled with people yet. Team placeholder.

24

General Gaming Talk / Re: Dota 2 CG Team?

« on: 09 Feb, 2013 23:13 »

I went ahead and made a team since people appear to be interested. Ask me to add you on steam, first come first server. We can always have multiple teams too should we choose.

25

General Gaming Talk / Dota 2 CG Team?

« on: 09 Feb, 2013 19:03 »

How would you all feel about a Dota 2 team consisting of CG members?

26

General Gaming Talk / Re: Whats your DBR?

« on: 02 Feb, 2013 23:42 »

Damnit, I really wanted to know how bad I was. D:

27

Solved Applications / Re: [MAU5]'s TTT Admin Application

« on: 31 Jan, 2013 22:58 »

^^^^



+1

28

Solved Applications / Re: [TTT] Andredem Re-Application

« on: 31 Jan, 2013 00:56 »

ANDRE 2013



+1

29

Solved Applications / Re: StormOfAshes TTT application

« on: 31 Jan, 2013 00:55 »

+1 He makes good brownies. Also a good admin.

30

Solved Applications / Re: Administrator Application TTT [DarkSide1811]

« on: 28 Jan, 2013 00:16 »

Don't even think I need to put in my opinion, I'd just be repeating everyone else. Sorry man, try again later. Totes lock dis thang