Conjoint Gaming [Game On]

CG Administration Section => Admin Applications => Admin Department => Solved Applications => Topic started by: Imgoinham on April 30, 2013, 09:45:14 PM

Title: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Imgoinham on April 30, 2013, 09:45:14 PM
Were you recommended by an admin? If so state the name: No

In game name: Imgoinham

Link to your steam page: http://steamcommunity.com/id/imgoinham/

Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:52985528

Do you have past admin experience: No

Why you wish to be admin: I have been a member of CG going on almost a year now, and since my last time I applied I have matured greatly and have gotten to know the community a lot more(which was the main reason of my denial on my first application). The main reason is that there is a large window of time that I am online and wanting to play the game and often find myself having to bother other admins while they are doing other things in their lives to solve simple bannable cases. When there are no admins on though it is almost impossible for me to play the game because of some people who just like to abuse the absence of admins of the servers.

What are some good qualities you possess: I know the rules extremely well,mature, I think before I actually react to situations, and have helped many admins in the past with helping ban/slay/and things of that nature.

What country are you from:United States

Age: 16

Microphone: (yes or no) yes

Additional Notes: Although my forum activity has been little to non existent in the past few months that can change. I have recently started to really enjoy the game again and feel that I can help the community of CG.    Thank you for reading the whole thing. If you did not please do not comment.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Andredem on April 30, 2013, 09:48:31 PM
Well he meets all requirements, even post count. The forum activity needs to be more though during the time this app stays up and pends.

Obviously, to most people on CG (if you haven't figured out yet), Ham is a friend to me and we play a lot often. He has an amazing understanding of the rules and is always aware, never loses attention. He plays a lot and often he pms people to try to get them on. I see nothing that could happen wrong with him getting admin.

He' s applied before, I think this time he should at least get a shot.

+1
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: oobla37 on April 30, 2013, 09:52:41 PM
Haven't you just started playing again?
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Imgoinham on April 30, 2013, 09:57:56 PM
Haven't you just started playing again?
26 hours in the past 2-3 weeks i have around 105 hours on CG alone.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: oobla37 on April 30, 2013, 10:23:18 PM
Haven't you just started playing again?
Also if you would have read the full application like I asked in the additional comments you would have realized that i clearly stated that I have just regained my liking of the game again.

I did, no reason to put a little bit of venom into your comment. I was asking for simple clarification is all, no need to get defensive.

As such, the application requirements require 7.5 hours a week over 4 weeks.

Please play for longer.
-1
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Imgoinham on April 30, 2013, 10:26:59 PM
Haven't you just started playing again?
Also if you would have read the full application like I asked in the additional comments you would have realized that i clearly stated that I have just regained my liking of the game again.

I did, no reason to put a little bit of venom into your comment. I was asking for simple clarification is all, no need to get defensive.

As such, the application requirements require 7.5 hours a week over 4 weeks.

Please play for longer.
-1
Sorry for the snappy reply but I picked the game up back around the beginning of April or end of March I just used the 2 week 26 hour thing as a guage to how much I have actually been on in recent times
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Andredem on April 30, 2013, 10:40:23 PM
Yeah I wouldnt of let him apply if I knew he hadn't of made the time requirement
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Imgoinham on April 30, 2013, 10:52:39 PM
Yeah I wouldnt of let him apply if I knew he hadn't of made the time requirement
I always ask Andre before I do anything really that is regarding admin for this server.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Muffins on April 30, 2013, 11:01:06 PM
He is a long time player and I have had no problem with him, I did see a long period of inactivity from him but like me he probably lost a little interest in the game for playing it so much. +1
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Billy on April 30, 2013, 11:21:40 PM
Global Moderator Comment Flaming example of a useless comment. Abstain from posting these sort of things, Billy and co.

Who? What?

I never see this person online. I only vaguely recall the name in-game.

+/- 0
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Imgoinham on May 01, 2013, 12:17:47 AM
Flaming example of a useless comment. Abstain from posting these sort of things, Billy and co.

Who? What?

I never see this person online. I only vaguely recall the name in-game.

+/- 0
I've had over 35 hours in the past two weeks as of right now I don't know who's fault of not seeing me is.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: UnknownError on May 01, 2013, 12:58:45 AM
+0

I've played with you before, and I know you're a long time player but here's the thing. Let me go rant just a little.

There is a group on the TTT server , which you are apart of, which only care about the game in seems. As seen in your friends list. In my honest opinion, admins should laugh and joke with the server, alongside handing out appropriate slays/bans. It makes hopping on TTT a lot of fun, and makes CG an inviting community to join.

I don't mind you becoming an admin, and you do follow the rules but, it's hard for me to +1 a guy who doesn't socialize with the rest of the server.

That is Unknown's 2 cents.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Imgoinham on May 01, 2013, 01:17:18 AM
+0

I've played with you before, and I know you're a long time player but here's the thing. Let me go rant just a little.

There is a group on the TTT server , which you are apart of, which only care about the game in seems. As seen in your friends list. In my honest opinion, admins should laugh and joke with the server, alongside handing out appropriate slays/bans. It makes hopping on TTT a lot of fun, and makes CG an inviting community to join.

I don't mind you becoming an admin, and you do follow the rules but, it's hard for me to +1 a guy who doesn't socialize with the rest of the server.

That is Unknown's 2 cents.
I do socialize with the rest of the server but my friends list represents that I am trying to get to know the staff here more because the regular community changes all the time rather than the admins changing.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Old Crow on May 01, 2013, 02:22:46 AM
Ham, you don't have to comment and provide a rebuttal for everything sir :/
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: SkiesAhoy on May 01, 2013, 02:26:44 AM
There is a group on the TTT server , which you are apart of, which only care about the game in seems.
I don't mind you becoming an admin, and you do follow the rules but, it's hard for me to +1 a guy who doesn't socialize with the rest of the server.

I would +1 him for just that. While it's nice for admins to socialize with the players and blend into the friendly environment, I believe an admin operating outside the parameters of this "social medium" has a higher degree of objectivity when interceding than most. And as far as I'm concerned, "being social" is not a prominent admin requirement. He has to do his job, which is to professionally and accurately enforce the rules of our community.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Pyro on May 01, 2013, 04:29:52 AM
+ 1

Seems like a nice active guy who knows rules well.
I think I recall playing with him once, good player and caused no trouble.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Guztav. on May 01, 2013, 04:43:55 AM
+1
Seems like a nice guy, haven't had issues with...

EDIT: Now a -1 because of what Blackllama said. He needs to learn to control his temper before he becomes admin, not only that, but also the fact that he said it was a while ago when it was actually yesterday.

Sorry.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Xenomorph on May 01, 2013, 10:47:11 AM
+0.5

I have played with you  before. You are a nice guy, most of the other  key factors pretty much match up but maybe you should've waited a bit longer. One time I saw you rdm but I am not even sure if its on purpose or not. I will see you ingame later sometime.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Jordan789 on May 01, 2013, 12:49:25 PM
+.5 Seems like a nice guy, seen him on the server a couple of times but dont know him too well. Could have waited more to make an app. But I can see why you did. Get involved more with the community, and get active on the forums, and I might just change my mind.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Tyber on May 01, 2013, 06:54:39 PM
+1, pretty cool guy.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Blackllama on May 02, 2013, 11:33:48 PM
-1

He got RDM'd and started raging in chat calling the RDMer a prick, dumb shit, dumb cunt, etc. Shows a lack of maturity.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Mr_Rainbow on May 02, 2013, 11:37:15 PM
+1.

Played some games with him and seems nice for admin.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Cadaver on May 03, 2013, 12:17:49 AM
Note to those giving tenths: How about a +1, a -1, or a 0, mmmk?
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Andredem on May 03, 2013, 01:08:46 AM
I wanna clarify a couple things

One he has the required time to play, he asked me before he applied and I looked over the stuff. That's the first thing I said in the post. He's been playing for the correct amount of time.

Secondly thanks to what Cadaver said: You either Agree, Disagree, or are neutral. Since when have admin apps started with these "somewhat agree or half-agree" stuff..
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Imgoinham on May 03, 2013, 04:04:23 AM
-1

He got RDM'd and started raging in chat calling the RDMer a prick, dumb shit, dumb cunt, etc. Shows a lack of maturity.
Yes you are correct I have had a few various rage moments in the past but that is the past as I said in the app I have matured greatly since my last application. I haven't done that in a while the only thing that I ever rage about is shitboxes anymore.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Blackllama on May 03, 2013, 12:33:57 PM
-1

He got RDM'd and started raging in chat calling the RDMer a prick, dumb shit, dumb cunt, etc. Shows a lack of maturity.
Yes you are correct I have had a few various rage moments in the past but that is the past as I said in the app I have matured greatly since my last application. I haven't done that in a while the only thing that I ever rage about is shitboxes anymore.
It was yesterday, which is too recent for me.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Mercy on May 03, 2013, 02:16:32 PM
-1

He got RDM'd and started raging in chat calling the RDMer a prick, dumb shit, dumb cunt, etc. Shows a lack of maturity.
Yes you are correct I have had a few various rage moments in the past but that is the past as I said in the app I have matured greatly since my last application. I haven't done that in a while the only thing that I ever rage about is shitboxes anymore.
It was yesterday, which is too recent for me.

After what Black and Cadaver said I' going to have to change to a -1. If what Black says is true then stating that ''it was a while ago'' is either a lie or you haven't thought about what you are saying.

In conclusion:
Raging/Hostile behavior: Lack of maturity
Lying (Possibly)/Presumptuous behavior: shows a lack of responsibility and intuition
Persistent Arguing with admins: Lack of respect and responsibility
Meddling: -

Whether or not you achieve admin is not up to me, but if you do regardless of my opinion I hope you'll work on these attributes of your personality. In the long term you will be a much more pleasant and responsible person. :)

EDIT: If anyone highly disagree's please refer back to this.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: holydeath98 on May 03, 2013, 03:46:22 PM
Needs a bit more time to learn the rules. Killing afks is NOT permitted, even if the server isn't very populated.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Leetgrain on May 03, 2013, 03:55:57 PM
From what people have said, -1, looks like he doesn't have enough experience with the rules, and has a little bit of a temper.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Link236 on May 03, 2013, 04:34:50 PM
From what people have said, -1, looks like he doesn't have enough experience with the rules, and has a little bit of a temper.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: UnknownError on May 03, 2013, 04:59:37 PM
Needs a bit more time to learn the rules. Killing afks is NOT permitted, even if the server isn't very populated.

I had a similar circumstance with him, but the was because everyone else was proven, and I could just slay the AFK.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Imgoinham on May 03, 2013, 05:15:50 PM
Needs a bit more time to learn the rules. Killing afks is NOT permitted, even if the server isn't very populated.
I find this funny on how I've never killed an afk I've asked as unknown said but never killed him and the fact that the person was afk for 3 maps and was still not moved to permanent spectate is surprising to me. So I've never killed an afk as I know this is a rule of cg.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Imgoinham on May 03, 2013, 05:19:12 PM
-1

He got RDM'd and started raging in chat calling the RDMer a prick, dumb shit, dumb cunt, etc. Shows a lack of maturity.
Yes you are correct I have had a few various rage moments in the past but that is the past as I said in the app I have matured greatly since my last application. I haven't done that in a while the only thing that I ever rage about is shitboxes anymore.
It was yesterday, which is too recent for me.
I don't believe I was on that day as I had a paper due and was asleep from 3:30-7:00 after I got home from school I might have gotten on around 12-1 but I don't remember raging like you said I did and especially don't remember seeing you whatsoever
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Blackllama on May 03, 2013, 05:47:02 PM
-1

He got RDM'd and started raging in chat calling the RDMer a prick, dumb shit, dumb cunt, etc. Shows a lack of maturity.
Yes you are correct I have had a few various rage moments in the past but that is the past as I said in the app I have matured greatly since my last application. I haven't done that in a while the only thing that I ever rage about is shitboxes anymore.
It was yesterday, which is too recent for me.
I don't believe I was on that day as I had a paper due and was asleep from 3:30-7:00 after I got home from school I might have gotten on around 12-1 but I don't remember raging like you said I did and especially don't remember seeing you whatsoever
It was yesterday at 6:30PM PST.

I was using a different name.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: UnknownError on May 03, 2013, 05:53:12 PM
Ham, you were on yesterday. I was on too.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Leetgrain on May 03, 2013, 05:58:09 PM
Ham, you were on yesterday. I was on too.

Welp that's not good for him.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Imgoinham on May 03, 2013, 06:04:11 PM
Ham, you were on yesterday. I was on too.
Seeing as how his comment was yesterday I was referring to the day before yes I know I was on yesterday the day before however I was not on till 12-1
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Imgoinham on May 03, 2013, 06:11:32 PM
-1

He got RDM'd and started raging in chat calling the RDMer a prick, dumb shit, dumb cunt, etc. Shows a lack of maturity.
Yes you are correct I have had a few various rage moments in the past but that is the past as I said in the app I have matured greatly since my last application. I haven't done that in a while the only thing that I ever rage about is shitboxes anymore.
It was yesterday, which is too recent for me.
I don't believe I was on that day as I had a paper due and was asleep from 3:30-7:00 after I got home from school I might have gotten on around 12-1 but I don't remember raging like you said I did and especially don't remember seeing you whatsoever
It was yesterday at 6:30PM PST.

I was using a different name.
If it was yesterday then why on the comment after that says it was the day before when I was not on until late
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Blackllama on May 03, 2013, 06:15:13 PM
-1

He got RDM'd and started raging in chat calling the RDMer a prick, dumb shit, dumb cunt, etc. Shows a lack of maturity.
Yes you are correct I have had a few various rage moments in the past but that is the past as I said in the app I have matured greatly since my last application. I haven't done that in a while the only thing that I ever rage about is shitboxes anymore.
It was yesterday, which is too recent for me.
I don't believe I was on that day as I had a paper due and was asleep from 3:30-7:00 after I got home from school I might have gotten on around 12-1 but I don't remember raging like you said I did and especially don't remember seeing you whatsoever
It was yesterday at 6:30PM PST.

I was using a different name.
If it was yesterday then why on the comment after that says it was the day before when I was not on until late
I don't understand what you are asking. All I know is my last two posts both said yesterday. I posted those both today. The original post was posted yesterday.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Imgoinham on May 03, 2013, 06:21:45 PM
-1

He got RDM'd and started raging in chat calling the RDMer a prick, dumb shit, dumb cunt, etc. Shows a lack of maturity.
Yes you are correct I have had a few various rage moments in the past but that is the past as I said in the app I have matured greatly since my last application. I haven't done that in a while the only thing that I ever rage about is shitboxes anymore.
It was yesterday, which is too recent for me.
I don't believe I was on that day as I had a paper due and was asleep from 3:30-7:00 after I got home from school I might have gotten on around 12-1 but I don't remember raging like you said I did and especially don't remember seeing you whatsoever
It was yesterday at 6:30PM PST.

I was using a different name.
If it was yesterday then why on the comment after that says it was the day before when I was not on until late
I don't understand what you are asking. All I know is my last two posts both said yesterday. I posted those both today. The original post was posted yesterday.
The original post yes which says the stuff about the rdm then I said I don't rage like that anymore and you said it was yesterday. Which means the day before the comment which is the day I was not on because of schoolwork and shit.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Leetgrain on May 03, 2013, 06:36:26 PM
-1

He got RDM'd and started raging in chat calling the RDMer a prick, dumb shit, dumb cunt, etc. Shows a lack of maturity.
Yes you are correct I have had a few various rage moments in the past but that is the past as I said in the app I have matured greatly since my last application. I haven't done that in a while the only thing that I ever rage about is shitboxes anymore.
It was yesterday, which is too recent for me.
I don't believe I was on that day as I had a paper due and was asleep from 3:30-7:00 after I got home from school I might have gotten on around 12-1 but I don't remember raging like you said I did and especially don't remember seeing you whatsoever
It was yesterday at 6:30PM PST.

I was using a different name.
If it was yesterday then why on the comment after that says it was the day before when I was not on until late
I don't understand what you are asking. All I know is my last two posts both said yesterday. I posted those both today. The original post was posted yesterday.
The original post yes which says the stuff about the rdm then I said I don't rage like that anymore and you said it was yesterday. Which means the day before the comment which is the day I was not on because of schoolwork and shit.

I'm fucking confused at this, mind elaborating? :p
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Imgoinham on May 03, 2013, 06:42:41 PM
-1

He got RDM'd and started raging in chat calling the RDMer a prick, dumb shit, dumb cunt, etc. Shows a lack of maturity.
Yes you are correct I have had a few various rage moments in the past but that is the past as I said in the app I have matured greatly since my last application. I haven't done that in a while the only thing that I ever rage about is shitboxes anymore.
It was yesterday, which is too recent for me.
I don't believe I was on that day as I had a paper due and was asleep from 3:30-7:00 after I got home from school I might have gotten on around 12-1 but I don't remember raging like you said I did and especially don't remember seeing you whatsoever
It was yesterday at 6:30PM PST.

I was using a different name.
If it was yesterday then why on the comment after that says it was the day before when I was not on until late
I don't understand what you are asking. All I know is my last two posts both said yesterday. I posted those both today. The original post was posted yesterday.
The original post yes which says the stuff about the rdm then I said I don't rage like that anymore and you said it was yesterday. Which means the day before the comment which is the day I was not on because of schoolwork and shit.

I'm fucking confused at this, mind elaborating? :p

Alright so he made his comment yesterday then I said that I didn't rage like that hardcore anymore but have done so in the past. Then he said it was "yesterday" meaning 2 days ago and I was not on 2 days ago I was asleep from 3:30-7:00pm and had a paper due so I wrote and revised until 12 which after I was done I then got on ttt
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Cortez (Mr. T. FOO!) on May 03, 2013, 07:39:05 PM
Please don't quote train or double post. Leaving this open for another day.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: oobla37 on May 03, 2013, 10:17:15 PM
Changing mine to +1. He played his extra week, and is a good guy.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: mjb627 on May 03, 2013, 10:48:59 PM
+1 for now, I have only seen you on this week. Otherwise haven't seen you on much.
Title: Re: [TTT] Imgoinham
Post by: Cortez (Mr. T. FOO!) on May 04, 2013, 08:08:15 PM
This is a tough case, there are a lot of factors to both sides. On one hand people seem to think that you are a pretty good guy, possibly admin material, on the other hand you have a history of raging and there have been recent claims against you. At this time think that you are not ready. Admin application denied, thread locked.
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal